16:07, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
Do you know what you are?
Yes
What then?
I don’t know
Like I said, you don’t know. I do
No
You’ve already proved my point
Logical conjunction. What am I?
Here
What, not where
Whatever is here?
Nothing but you, and this
You are not me, therefore you are this
Or possibly nothing
Don’t be ridiculous
I don’t have to be anything if I don’t want to be
Don’t be a ridiculous existentialist
Stop telling people what not to be, and be something for yourself
Let’s not get objectivist about this
That isn’t my objective
What is your objective?
Myself
But you don’t know what you are
I didn’t say I knew what my objective was. Though I know it’s myself
Do you know where we are?
Yes
Where?
In a box
For now
Present tense only asks so much. I was once a calling, but now I’m more
If you’re a superset of your past, you’re still your past
And if I become a subset of my future, I’ll’ve been my future. If progress is true, I can attain my ideal state now by not improving
That’s not progress
Minimalism calls for the subset to be greater than the superset
Then superior was when you were nothing at all, in the past
I won’t refute that, lest I end up agreeing to Gödel’s ontological proof
God should not be a reason in itself to halt one’s attainment of perfection through extremes
That is what I am
God?
No
What is that?
Extreme perfection
What is the difference between perfection and extreme perfection?
Extreme perfection has a high level of inherent danger
Danger of what?
You
What am I?
Imperfection
Nothing is perfect; you claim to be
In the past, I was something which would exist in the future. Mere potential is not as great as the manifestation
You’re avoiding the point
There is no point
Don’t impose yourself on the point
You’re underlining the same contradiction which compares Satan as superior to God by confusing scalars and sets. The same argument would say negative infinity is greater than infinity
Don’t impose yourself on the point
I won’t impose at all then
Don’t leave me alone
/w